Are you an avid cyclist, or do you ride leisurely and
occasionally? Are you athletic, or do you suffer from arthritis? All these
questions and more will help you select the best bike option for your riding
style and body type. While many people want the newest trends, like womens hybrid bikes,
others prefer the traditional self-propelled models. However, in the world of
cycling, there is a great debate rising on the horizon between recumbent and
upright bikes. Which bicycle do you prefer? If you are unsure, there are at
least six comparisons that can help you decide.
1. Body Position
The primary difference between recumbent and upright bikes
is the rider position. While everyone is likely familiar with the standard
rider position on a traditional upright bicycle, the rider is reclined on
recumbent bikes for women
or men, with their legs out in front. The recumbent posture may seem odd to
most traditional riders, but it can allow for a better center of gravity,
meaning better balance.
2. Seat Style
One of the typical hassles for most traditional cyclists is
finding a comfortable bike seat. The triangular seat, while necessary for
correct leg position, is not the most comfortable, especially for heavier
individuals. There is a resolution to the seat problem on a recumbent women and
men's bike.
The rider position requires not only a larger seat but also a backrest, meaning
that cyclists receive a more chair-like and comfortable seat, which is
beneficial for longer rides.
3. Pedal Position
Traditional bicycles position the pedals under the operator.
Unfortunately, the under-mount position leads to riders standing when riding,
which allows for wobbly posturing. If a cyclist isn't careful, they can hurt
themselves. Recumbent bicycles do not allow for standing operation because the
pedals are out in front of the rider.
4. Joint Impact
Recumbent bikes are low-impact compared to upright bikes.
The laid back design keeps the pressure off of the hips and upper body, which
is beneficial to those riders who suffer from rheumatoid arthritis. However,
bicycles, in general, are lower impact than most cardiovascular exercises
because the feet and legs do not absorb shock with every extension of the legs.
5. Injury Risks
Recumbent bikes are a safe option for riders. The low
design, improved center of gravity and inability to stand make the possibility
of injury minute. With upright bikes, the balance or stability of the bicycle
is based on the rider alone, making the risk of a spill more likely.
6. Overall Safety
Regardless of the advantages of one bike over the other, any
rider should be safe while riding. There are risks involved with cycling that
are out of any rider's control. Make sure you wear a helmet and pads, and if
you choose a recumbent bike, be sure to install a safety flag.
No one can tell you whether to ride a recumbent or upright
bicycle. The decision comes down to personal preference. However, if you would
like more guidance on making a choice, contact a local bike shop to discuss
your options.
